I own practically all the 1963 Sea-Gull editions, as well as a few watches created by Seagull Tsinlien before Sea-Gull Tianjin launched its own models—and for this reason I consider them authentic—and, aesthetically, they are indeed very, very similar. The ST 1901 movement is certainly more refined in the special editions, the resistance of the pulsators is sharper, the winding wheel is smoother and the movement is more homogeneous. But when you look at them, the 1963s are essentially all the same. The Times Edition is certainly an exception to this rule. Its larger, yet still very "vintage" dimensions for a chronograph, the recessed sub-indices with concentric decoration that gives it depth and three-dimensionality, and the larger and more comfortable-to-operate winding wheel make the Times Edition a very special 1963. For the record, none of the Seagull 1963s, neither the legitimate ones from Tianjin nor the authentic ones from Tsienlin, are entirely faithful copies of the D304 project prototype, which never actually went into production. The 37.3 mm case is closer to the original than the 40 mm of the Times Edition, but the latter's sub-indices, as well as its steel caseback, are more faithful than those of the other editions. Aesthetically, the Times Edition is certainly a more refined watch, which is reflected in its price. In my opinion, it's worth it.
Seagull 1963 Chronograph Watch Original Times Edition 40mm
Store owner replied: Thank you, Franco, for such a thoughtful and in-depth review. It’s clear you have a deep understanding of the 1963 lineage, and we truly appreciate you sharing both your insights and your collection with us. Your observations on the ST1901 refinement, case proportions, and the distinct design elements of the Times Edition are incredibly valuable. It’s especially rewarding to see the recessed sub-dials, vintage-inspired sizing, and enhanced ergonomics recognized as part of what makes this edition stand out. We’d love to hear even more from you, particularly your long-term experience across the different 1963 variations, and how the Times Edition compares in daily wear and performance. And your photos are outstanding, they really capture the character of the watch. Thank you again for your support and for contributing such a professional perspective to the community.
